-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Le 12 févr. 07 à 02:20, Kevin Ballard a écrit :
> On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:55 PM, mathew wrote: > >> I agree. I think HAML is a dumb idea, because it means you can't just >> edit your templates in a standard XHTML or XML editor. > > Buh? Who edits HTML in an XML editor? Especially since the eRB > escapes aren't, to my knowledge, real XML escapes and so I should > be able to construct a valid RHTML file which isn't valid XML. > >> If typo moves to HAML, I drop typo, unless there's an HTML-to-HAML >> converter. I don't want to learn another markup language unless >> there's a really, really compelling reason. Making templates take up >> less characters is not that reason. > > Why would you have to learn HAML? If we push out a stable Typo that > uses HAML, we'll make sure themes can still use rhtml, so there > should be no problem here. > What we're actually going to do is leave one theme with HAML and one with RHTML. This way, people who want to use HAML – like I do – will use it, and people who want to open their template in an HTML editor will bbe able to do so. That way, everyone's going to be happy. - -- Frédéric de Villamil [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel: +33 (0)6 62 19 1337 http://fredericdevillamil.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFF0DrNCvkKk5nKviARArfuAKCxbycutMj7XJ6j+XU0ATiealCJcQCeKfcH O5zbOl1+lhxM2MtfslT3opw= =7dIx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
