Scott Likens wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Rodger Donaldson wrote:
Chet Farmer wrote:
Now, there's no real difference with Mongrel/Webrick if you run
nginx or Apache or lighttpd. It works, it's well documented and
takes the most amount of memory (actually all of them really take
the same amount of memory, you just don't see the ruby process
hanging around using up 140megs of memory).
Um, no. It is NOT well documented, or, if it is, those documents are
not easy to find.
I'll certainly agree with that. Getting mongrel working with
mod_proxy was essentially an exercise in Google and reading blogs.
Why is mod_proxy working with mongrel such an exercise?
That's it as a whole, 7 whole lines. Add that to your apache
configuration in a Virtualhost area for your blog and startup typo and
you should be golden.
At which point you wonder why everything is running so slow, and you
discover that mongrel really, really sucks at delivering image files and
the like. So your 7 line example works if you want horrible performance
with even a trivial number of users.
I've tried Gentoo and it's worked excellent also, so perhaps some research is
in order?
Actually, I've used Ruby on a number of the Linux problems, and the
interaction of Gems and Ruby is a problem on all of them. A snide and
condescendng tone does not change this fact, it merely convinces people
they don't want to bother using typo.
_______________________________________________
Typo-list mailing list
Typo-list@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
