On 07/08/2025 13:13, Paul Barker wrote:
On Thu, 2025-08-07 at 12:30 +0100, Andrew Goodbody wrote:
In rzg2l_pinconf_set and rzg2l_get_pin_muxing if the call to
rzg2l_selector_decode fails then the variable pin may not have been
assigned to. Remove the use of pin from the error message.
This issue was found by Smatch.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodb...@linaro.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/renesas/rzg2l-pfc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/rzg2l-pfc.c
b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/rzg2l-pfc.c
index 3c751e9473a..3bdba5e365c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/rzg2l-pfc.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/rzg2l-pfc.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static int rzg2l_pinconf_set(struct udevice *dev, unsigned
int pin_selector,
/* The pin selector refers to a multiplexed pin */
int port = rzg2l_selector_decode(data, pin_selector, &pin);
if (port < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "Invalid pin selector %u:%u\n", port, pin);
+ dev_err(dev, "Invalid pin selector %u\n", port);
Thanks for catching this and sending a patch!
The proposed change is actually still invalid - port is a signed value so %u is
wrong, and port will just be a negative error number here.
What I should have done is printed the invalid selector, which is an unsigned
int:
dev_err(dev, "Invalid pin selector %u\n", pin_selector);
return port;
}
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ static int rzg2l_get_pin_muxing(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int selector,
port = rzg2l_selector_decode(data, selector, &pin);
if (port < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "Invalid pin selector %u:%u\n", port, pin);
+ dev_err(dev, "Invalid pin selector %u\n", port);
Ditto here:
dev_err(dev, "Invalid pin selector %u\n", selector);
Do you want to send a v2?
Thanks,
Thanks for the comments, yes I will send a V2.
Andrew