On 8/21/25 5:35 AM, dinesh.mani...@altera.com wrote:
From: Dinesh Maniyam <dinesh.mani...@altera.com>
The existing 'bridge' command help was incomplete and contained a
spelling error. This patch updates the help text to clearly describe
the available bridge bit positions and their corresponding masks:
The command was primarily written for CV/AV , that's why it was
incomplete for newer SoCs. Instead of the bit handling, why not add
support for symbolic name handling instead ?
Add 'bridge list' to print supported bridges per SoC.
Add 'bridge set' which handles bridge=state parameters, e.g. 'bridge set
h2f=1 f2h=0 ...'. That will be future proof and scale.
