On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 at 22:08, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote: > > On 11.08.25 01:37, Adriano Carvalho wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Adriano Carvalho <adrianocarvalho...@gmail.com> > > --- > > tools/buildman/buildman.rst | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/buildman/buildman.rst b/tools/buildman/buildman.rst > > index d5d22732088..7944adcd867 100644 > > --- a/tools/buildman/buildman.rst > > +++ b/tools/buildman/buildman.rst > > @@ -478,7 +478,8 @@ Setting up > > > > At the time of writing, U-Boot has these architectures: > > > > - arc, arm, m68k, microblaze, mips, nios2, powerpc, sandbox, sh, x86, > > xtensa > > + arc, arm, m68k, microblaze, mips, nios2, powerpc, riscv, sandbox, > > sh, x86, > > + xtensa > > The output examples above this line should also be updated to show RISC-V.
Do you mean what's under "Check the available toolchains"? To reproduce, I would need to install quite a few toolchains. If anyone already has all those toolchains they could just send me the output. Do you know someone who can do that? Can you do that? Or should I just install all those toolchains and reproduce? > Shouldn't we provide human readable names, e.g. > > * RISC-V (riscv) > * SuperH (sh) That seems right. I'll include that in the next revision. How do you call the "actual" name v. the "code" name? I am thinking of adding something like this after the list: Each item above includes the architecture's "actual" name and in parenthesis the architecture "code" name in U-Boot. [...] Com os melhores cumprimentos. / Best regards. Adriano Carvalho
