Kim Phillips wrote: > I'd prefer firmware uploading bits remain apps (perhaps in examples/?) > but I don't know the "U-Boot Philosophy" for this area..
The whole point behind this patch is to get rid of the currently application and make this a native feature of U-Boot. In this regard, it is no different than my QE firmware patch. > drivers/net bits go through net maintainer, Ben Warren (separate patch). I can break it into two patches. >> +#include <config.h> >> +#include <common.h> >> +#include <asm/io.h> >> +#include <asm/errno.h> > > This breaks some archs. Which ones? How? These header files look pretty harmless to me. What if I did this: #include <config.h> #ifdef CONFIG_VSC7385_ENET #include <common.h> #include <asm/io.h> #include <asm/errno.h> > who is the original author of this code? One of our BSP developers. I took the code from his application and cleaned it up. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
