Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Feb 18, 2008, at 1:15 PM, Jerry Van Baren wrote: > >> Kumar Gala wrote: >>> On Feb 18, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Jerry Van Baren wrote: >>>> Kumar Gala wrote:
[[[[snip]]]] >> The patch is creating dummy initrd entries in the reserved map and in >> /chosen, only to work hard to delete and re-create the reserved map >> entries and rewrite the /chosen entries. >> >> My counter-proposal is to not bother with dummy values. Simply pass >> in 0,0 which will prevent the creation of the initrd entries by >> fdt_chosen(). By not creating dummy entries, you can simply create >> the proper entries once you know what the the correct values are, >> rather than the more complicated rsvmap search & delete + rsvmap >> creation + /chosen modifications. > > Ahh, the reason I wanted them created was to ensure we have enough size > for them up front rather than figuring that out later. By creating them > and replacing them I will not being changing the size at all. > > - k OK, I see. Currently this isn't an issue because our blob has a fixed size that has free space inside it, so creating the rsvmap and /chosen entries eat at the internal free space and don't change the total blob size. People are advocating dynamically increasing the blob size, which simplifies things for blob generation (don't have to guess how big to make the blob when running the dtc to create it), but that would cause problems with my counter-proposal. Thanks, gvb ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
