Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >>> And the whole point of my patch was to enable the ability to >>> dynamically grow the blob before we do anything w/the ramdisk. >> So what is the state of this patch now? Will it go in through the FDT >> custodian repo, or has it been rejected, or am I supposed to apply it >> directly? Or? [...] > Most of the email exchanges were with me and the patch is fine IMHO. > > I was expecting it to go through the "new-image" custodian, but I would > be happy to apply it to the u-boot-fdt repo and push it up from there.
Jerry, Kumar, I think it would be better to have this patch (and other ones by Kumar that touch booting-related code) go through the new-image branch. Otherwise we'll have merge conflicts down the road, especially since we've got a big patch coming, that adds framework for new image handling. I'd like to have this framework patch merged first, then take care of (re-based) boot-related patches that have been posted recently. Regards, Bartlomiej ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
