Dear Kumar,
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> would phys_size_t be better?
Yes, definitely much better :-)
> >> +phys_addr_t initdram(int board_type)
> >> {
> >> - long dram_size = 0;
> >> + phys_addr_t dram_size = 0;
> >
> > No - initdram() does not return an address, it returns a size.
>
> Sure, I understand it returns a size. I was just using phys_addr_t to
> represent the type for both addresses and sizes.
I think that would be misleading. To me, phys_addr_t looks like a
pointer type, while *_size_t is an (unsigned?) integer type.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... bacteriological warfare ... hard to believe we were once foolish
enough to play around with that.
-- McCoy, "The Omega Glory", stardate unknown
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
