In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Shouldn't we just use size_t to return the size of what is effectively 
> an array of /n/ bytes of RAM?  (Does size_t's baggage WRT different C 
> standards and different C compilers cause more grief than it solves?)

My understanding is that size_t is a 32 bit type even on systems with
32+ bit physical addresses.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Nature is very un-American.  Nature never hurries."
- William George Jordan

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to