On Tuesday 25 March 2008, Ben Warren wrote: > I thought about this some more, and the problem is that cpu_eth_init() and > board_eth_init() are mutually exclusive,
Right. > with board_eth_init() having a > higher priority. I think the following will work, but would appreciate some > feedback. > > ----- > > int board_eth_init(bd_t *bis) __attribute(weak); > int cpu_eth_init(bd_t *bis) __attribute(weak); > > . > . > . > > if (board_eth_init) > board_eth_init(bis); > else if (cpu_eth_init) > cpu_eth_init(bis); > > ----- > > This gets rid of the pointless aliases and gives precedence to the > board-specific initialization. I like it. Thanks. Best regards, Stefan ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===================================================================== ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
