Hi, On 25 Mar 2008 at 16:24, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > diff --git a/common/env_common.c b/common/env_common.c > > index a494812..8acee8f 100644 > > --- a/common/env_common.c > > +++ b/common/env_common.c > > @@ -243,6 +243,11 @@ void env_relocate (void) > > #endif > > env_crc_update (); > > gd->env_valid = 1; > > +#ifdef CFG_ENV_AUTOSAVE > > + gd->env_addr = (ulong)&(env_ptr->data); > > + puts ("Saving environment\n"); > > + saveenv (); > > +#endif > > } > > else { > > env_relocate_spec (); > > > > I'll point some problem that could appear with some flash that need to > drive some pio before write or erase the flash due to VPP protection that´s one of the reasons why I am asking - I only tested this with my environment being in flash (handled by env_flash.c), and here my impression was that all such mechanisms should be handled by saveenv() internally (calling flash_sect_protect() etc.). > If you want to add an autosave you may need to add a pre-save and > post-save mecanism Hmm... I just looked in cmd_nvedit.c, and there is nothing else visible when saveenv() is called. How would these pre-save and post-save things supposed to be handled from the regular command-line interface? > and I'll prefer CONFIG_ENV_AUTOSAVE than CFG_ENV_AUTOSAVE. Sorry for that, obviously you are correct, I was confused by the CFG_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT some lines above. > Best Regards, > J. Regards, Wolfgang ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users