Hi,

On 25 Mar 2008 at 16:24, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

> > diff --git a/common/env_common.c b/common/env_common.c
> > index a494812..8acee8f 100644
> > --- a/common/env_common.c
> > +++ b/common/env_common.c
> > @@ -243,6 +243,11 @@ void env_relocate (void)
> >  #endif
> >             env_crc_update ();
> >             gd->env_valid = 1;
> > +#ifdef CFG_ENV_AUTOSAVE
> > +           gd->env_addr = (ulong)&(env_ptr->data);
> > +           puts ("Saving environment\n");
> > +           saveenv ();
> > +#endif
> >     }
> >     else {
> >             env_relocate_spec ();
> > 
> 
> I'll point some problem that could appear with some flash that need to
> drive some pio before write or erase the flash due to VPP protection

that´s one of the reasons why I am asking - I only tested this with my
environment being in flash (handled by env_flash.c), and here my
impression was that all such mechanisms should be handled by
saveenv() internally (calling flash_sect_protect() etc.).

> If you want to add an autosave you may need to add a pre-save and
> post-save mecanism

Hmm... I just looked in cmd_nvedit.c, and there is nothing else visible
when saveenv() is called. How would these pre-save and post-save
things supposed to be handled from the regular command-line interface?

> and I'll prefer CONFIG_ENV_AUTOSAVE than CFG_ENV_AUTOSAVE.

Sorry for that, obviously you are correct, I was confused by the
CFG_REDUNDAND_ENVIRONMENT some lines above.

> Best Regards,
> J.

Regards,
Wolfgang


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to