On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 02:01:09PM -0700, Ron Madrid wrote:
> So does this mean that I need to now base all of my patches off of the 
> mtd-2.6.22.1 branch on the
> u-boot-nand-flash tree?  How do the two (u-boot and u-boot-nand-flash) 
> coincide, or don't they? 
> It looks like in the Makefile of the mtd-2.6.22.1 branch the version of 
> u-boot is 1.3.1.

I hope to get mtd-2.6.22.1 rebased onto current u-boot soon.

-Scott

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to