So am I just stuck until then, since we clearly shouldn't put old drivers into the code, but the mtd branch is not rebased yet? Or is there some other road I should be following?
Ron --- Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 02:01:09PM -0700, Ron Madrid wrote: > > So does this mean that I need to now base all of my patches off of the > > mtd-2.6.22.1 branch on > the > > u-boot-nand-flash tree? How do the two (u-boot and u-boot-nand-flash) > > coincide, or don't > they? > > It looks like in the Makefile of the mtd-2.6.22.1 branch the version of > > u-boot is 1.3.1. > > I hope to get mtd-2.6.22.1 rebased onto current u-boot soon. > > -Scott > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
