I would vote for making bad black handling the default. I've been working on fixing up a design of ours that mistakenly used non block skipping version and I've been trying to find all the places were bad block's were not being skipped and fixes them. Our system only uses NAND flash and people are very concerned about it.
Stuart On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grant Erickson wrote: >> Thanks for the suggestion. That solved it. As an academic exercise, is there >> any practical reason a system would want to use nboot, as I erroneously >> chose to do, without .i|.jffs2|.e? > > I don't think so, though I don't know the history involved. Does anyone > actually use the non-block-skipping versions of any of the nand commands > (intentionally, that is)? If the answer is no, then we could make it > the default. > > -Scott > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot-Users mailing list > U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users > -- Stuart Wood Lab X Technologies, LLC 176 Anderson Ave. Suite 302 Rochester, NY 14607 Phone: (585) 271-7790 x207 Fax: (585) 473.4707 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
