Hi Scott,

we are using the NAND stuff for a couple of boards. All use the .i or .jffs2 
extension.
So I also vote for making skipping the default. But the extensions should be 
preserved :-)

Matthias

On Tuesday 03 June 2008 00:07, Scott Wood wrote:
> Grant Erickson wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestion. That solved it. As an academic exercise, is there
> > any practical reason a system would want to use nboot, as I erroneously
> > chose to do, without .i|.jffs2|.e?
> 
> I don't think so, though I don't know the history involved.  Does anyone 
> actually use the non-block-skipping versions of any of the nand commands 
> (intentionally, that is)?  If the answer is no, then we could make it 
> the default.
> 
> -Scott

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to