On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:25:34 +0200
Andre Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello Andre,

> diff --git a/include/configs/MVBLM7.h b/include/configs/MVBLM7.h
> index 349ca14..8c0e8b6 100644
> --- a/include/configs/MVBLM7.h
> +++ b/include/configs/MVBLM7.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>  #ifndef __CONFIG_H
>  #define __CONFIG_H
>  
> -#define MV_VERSION  "v1.0.1"
> +#define MV_VERSION  "v1.0.2"

instead of incrementing this for each patch, can we just use
U_BOOT_VERSION instead?

>  #define CONFIG_HAS_ETH0
> +#define CONFIG_ETHADDR          b6:b4:45:eb:fb:c0
>  #define CONFIG_TSEC1_NAME    "TSEC0"
>  #define CONFIG_FEC1_PHY_NORXERR
>  #define CFG_TSEC1_OFFSET     0x24000
> @@ -224,6 +225,7 @@
>  #define TSEC1_FLAGS          (TSEC_GIGABIT|TSEC_REDUCED)
>  
>  #define CONFIG_HAS_ETH1
> +#define CONFIG_ETH1ADDR         b6:b4:45:eb:fb:c2
>  #define CONFIG_TSEC2_NAME    "TSEC1"

I had removed this from your original board port because this goes
against recommended practice; see:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/41178

> +#define CONFIG_HIGH_BATS       1

this line applied.

Kim

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to