Hi again! On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:05:10AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
>> Therefore, I still believe that such a feature is useful and should be >> merged into u-boot. If there are problems with my particular >> implementation, I'm happy to address them. > > Can you base it off of the testing branch of the u-boot-nand-flash repo? I just tried it, and the patch actually applies cleanly to the nand-flash/testing branch. So feel free to go ahead and merge :) >> I also have another patchset for what I call 'dynpart' support, i.e. the >> dynamic calculation of a unit-specific partition table that ensures the >> net size of partitions are as per spec, no matter how many of the >> factory default blocks are located where. So it would even support >> NAND devices with a worse spec than the ones that we were using. I'll base that also on top of nand-flash/testing and submit later. Will probably need some generalization for the board-level integration. Cheers, -- - Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://openmoko.org/ ============================================================================ Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
