On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 01:28:42PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote:
> >> Therefore, I still believe that such a feature is useful and should be
> >> merged into u-boot.  If there are problems with my particular
> >> implementation, I'm happy to address them.
> >
> > Can you base it off of the testing branch of the u-boot-nand-flash repo?
> 
> I just tried it, and the patch actually applies cleanly to the
> nand-flash/testing branch.   So feel free to go ahead and merge :)

sorry, my fault.  cleanly applying patch doesn't mean it actually
compiles and/or uses the api's correctly.

I'm sending an updated patch ASAP.
-- 
- Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to