Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> In message: Re: [U-Boot-Users] cpu/mpc85xx/fdt.c forcing incorrect UART clock 
> into fdt.
> on 09/07/2008 Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
>> On Jul 8, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>
>>> I fixed it with this simple patch, but I was wondering whether it  
>>> would
>>> be better to alternatively just check if the dtb value is zero, and
>>> then only insert a value; otherwise leave it alone...
>> I think that should be left up to a board to decide, but in general it  
>> seems like doing the setting unconditionally is ok, we just didn't  
>> handle the case you had and the patch address it.
> 
> OK, so that we only end up changing just one thing at a time, I'll
> spin a proper patch which just makes the NS16550_CLK change, and
> we can change the create flag as per Jerry's comment at a later date
> if required.
> 
> In the interest of consistency, I've make the same change for 83xx and
> 86xx as well, since the code is pretty much identical, and a MAKEALL
> shows no boards failing due to a non-defined NS16550_CLK.  Patch to
> follow shortly...
> 
> Thanks,
> Paul.

FWIIW, this works for me (with my disclaimer of not being a domain expert).

gvb

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to