> Thanks. This won't apply against the net/testing branch because I've > already removed a bunch of the other initializations. If you don't > mind, I'll take care of this one along with many others in the coming > few days. Go ahead
> > Contradicting what I mentioned in another e-mail, this one does appear > to make more sense as a cpu_eth_init, since all three (plus the new > one) call only one MACB controller. Not a strong opinion, though, so > if anybody wants it as board_eth_init, speak up. > Personnaly I prefer it in cpu_eth_init because it's cpu dependant not board dependant Best Regards, J. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
