Hello, I would like to get your general opinion about changing the U-Boot version numbering scheme.
To be honest, I never really understood myself how this is supposed to work and if the next version should be 1.3.4 or 1.4.0 or 2.0.0, i. e. which changes / additions are important enough to increment the PATCHLEVEL or even VERSION number. I therefor suggest to drop this style of version numbering and change to a timestamp based version number system which has been quite successfully used by other projects (like Ubuntu) or is under discussion (for Linux). My suggestion for the new version numbers is as follows: VERSION = 1 (at least for the time being) PATCHLEVEL = current year - 2000 SUBLEVEL = current month Both PATCHLEVEL and SUBLEVEL shall always be 2 digits (at least for the next 91+ years to come) so listings for example on an FTP server shall be in a sane sorting order. If we accept this system, the next release which probably comes out in October 2008 would be v1.08.10, and assuming the one after that comes out in January 2009 would be named v1.09.01 Comments? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Real computer scientists despise the idea of actual hardware. Hard- ware has limitations, software doesn't. It's a real shame that Turing machines are so poor at I/O. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
