In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > That's what we've been doing so far:
> > 
> >     -> ls -l include/s3c*
> >     -rw-rw-r-- 1 wd wd 21763 Dec  9  2007 include/s3c2400.h
> >     -rw-rw-r-- 1 wd wd  7629 Dec  9  2007 include/s3c2410.h
> >     -rw-rw-r-- 1 wd wd 38129 Oct 13  2007 include/s3c24x0.h
> 
> Sorry, don't understand. So is it okay, that these files reside in the 
> include directory or not?

Unless you want to submit a clenaup patch for many existing
processors, yes.

What is your suggestion instead?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Data is a lot like humans: It is  born.  Matures.  Gets  married  to
other  data, divorced. Gets old. One thing that it doesn't do is die.
It has to be killed."                                 - Arthur Miller

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to