On 13:03 Thu 07 Aug , Jens Gehrlein wrote: > Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > >>> That's what we've been doing so far: > >>> > >>> -> ls -l include/s3c* > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 wd wd 21763 Dec 9 2007 include/s3c2400.h > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 wd wd 7629 Dec 9 2007 include/s3c2410.h > >>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 wd wd 38129 Oct 13 2007 include/s3c24x0.h > >> Sorry, don't understand. So is it okay, that these files reside in the > >> include directory or not? > > > > Unless you want to submit a clenaup patch for many existing > > processors, yes. > > > > What is your suggestion instead? > > It was just a question to read your opinion. Personally, I can live with > it. I thought, CPU specific header files had to go to the > include/asm-<arch>/arch-<cpu> directory.
Currently the kernel start move to move it to include/arch/asm I'll prefer to use this Best Regards, J. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
