Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> PCI bus is inherently 64-bit. We should treat all PCI related bus >> addresses as 64-bit quanities. This allows us to have the ability >> to support devices or memory on the PCI bus above the 32-bit boundary. > > I don't think this is a good idea. There are pure 32 bit systems out > there which will never use more than 32 bit for the PCI resources, so > why load them with the additional memory size and execution time? > > Should we not enable this only for such systems that actually need it? > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk
Why would we not use phys_addr_t and phys_size_t for the PCI addresses? Best regards, gvb _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
