On Oct 21, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message <A16160A4-977E-48A0-83D1- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: >> >> If this is desired to be configurable should I introduce a >> pci_addr_t/ >> pci_size_t? Coupling to phys_addr_t/phys_size_t doesn't make sense >> to >> me because its perfectly reasonable to have a 64-bit PCI device work >> in a 32-bit system. > > I think using pci_addr_t/pci_size_t is the most reasonable > suggestion, then (but it may turn into fighting a lot of new warnings > about incompatible types for one board or another).
Ok, I'll switch over to these types and post a new patch. - k _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
