Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Ben Warren,
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> Why not enable this feature on Sequoia? Wolfgang's argument for keeping
>> the patch out then goes away. IMHO, eval boards should have as many
>> options enabled by default as possible, and the user then has the option
>> to opt out.
>
> But there is not a single SPI device on the Sequoia board, and if you
> attach one, you have to write driver code for it that implements the
> chip select handling and the specific device protocol. We would have
> a driver included, without any "users" (code that actually calls
> these functions).
>
> In other words, this driver is a prerequisite for other SPI device
> drivers that might follow later, but as is, it's just a waste of
> memory.
>
> It would just waste memory to enable it.
Makes sense.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
The problem is that if it isn't accepted now, nobody is likely to remember
that it is available, and so they will have to re-write it. Also, it will
suffer from bit-rot, if just left as a loose patch.
Steve
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
