Hi Stefano, On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 11:24:15 +0100, Stefano Babic <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27/12/2012 11:14, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Stefano, > > > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Stefano Babic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Fabio, hi Robert, > >> > >> the new pmic framework calls malloc(), that the reason. It is then safe > >> to call the init from board_late_init(). > >> > >> Tested-by: Stefano Babic <[email protected]> > >> > >> Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks. > >> > >> gcc 4.6.4, it boots always here. > > > > Ok, great. > > > > When you enter commands in the U-boot prompt, does it work fine? > > Yes, it is. > > > With > > the toolchains that myself and Robert used we are seeing resets. > > > > I would like to try the same gcc 4.6.4 toolchain you are using. Where > > do you get it from? > > It comes from ELDK-5.2.1 > > > > > I am playing a bit, I do not see your problem. I admit I have no idea > which dialog version is on my board. > > The only issue I can see is with MMC - I see with "fatls" any entry twice: > > MX53LOCO U-Boot > fatls mmc 0:2 > 1 cmdline > 1 cmdline > 283472 u-boot.bin > 283472 u-boot.bin > 284496 u-boot.imx > 284496 u-boot.imx > 4093544 uimage > 4093544 uimage > 160291 uinitrd > 160291 uinitrd > 349 boot.txt > 349 boot.txt > 421 boot.scr > 421 boot.scr > > But this is surely another issue....
Re the double entries, did you check if these could be short / DOS (8.3) names vs long names? IIRC, for compatibility, in a (V)FAT directory any entry with a name longer than 8.3 has a matching short entry; maybe on the device you're ls'ing, *any* entry has a short version? > Best regards, > Stefano Babic Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
