Hi Stefano, On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 09:38:47 +0100, Stefano Babic <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27/12/2012 17:27, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hi Stefano, > > > > Hi Albert, > > >> I am playing a bit, I do not see your problem. I admit I have no idea > >> which dialog version is on my board. > >> > >> The only issue I can see is with MMC - I see with "fatls" any entry twice: > >> > >> MX53LOCO U-Boot > fatls mmc 0:2 > >> 1 cmdline > >> 1 cmdline > >> 283472 u-boot.bin > >> 283472 u-boot.bin > >> 284496 u-boot.imx > >> 284496 u-boot.imx > >> 4093544 uimage > >> 4093544 uimage > >> 160291 uinitrd > >> 160291 uinitrd > >> 349 boot.txt > >> 349 boot.txt > >> 421 boot.scr > >> 421 boot.scr > >> > >> But this is surely another issue.... > > > > Re the double entries, did you check if these could be short / DOS (8.3) > > names vs long names? IIRC, for compatibility, in a (V)FAT directory any > > entry with a name longer than 8.3 has a matching short entry; maybe on > > the device you're ls'ing, *any* entry has a short version? > > That is the point. I tested with another SD-Card, putting also long > names, and I get: > > 614 loadbootscr.scr > 614 loadbo~1.scr > 2606096 swupdate-image-thb.ext3.gz.u-boot > 2606096 swupda~1.u-b > 3893896 uimage-thb.bin > 3893896 uimage~1.bin > > There is an entry for long name and one for short name. And with the > other SD, all entries has a short version. Simply I do not remember I > have already seen the double entries in the past..
Yes, normally there should be two different entries; my question was, more precisely, whether you checked if the very SD card with which you saw duplicates appear actually held such duplicates -- as opposed to holding single entries duplicated by the U-Boot code. > Best regards, > Stefano Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
