Dear Otavio Salvador, > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Otavio Salvador > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I prefer to have this as is and share documentation with mx28. The > > NAND ought to be done providing same interface so one doc for it all. > > I think change it in next version is wrong and confuse users. > > Ping? > > We won't be able to get rid of mxsboot for NAND use-case so I'd prefer > to have it for SD as well. For me it does not matter much as I use OE > and it automates it all; but for ordinary user it is important to it > to be consistent so all 'mxs' SoC would work same way from user point > of view. > > If we find a better way of doing things in future we can base on this > and improve it later but please let's get it in and move forward...
Does my proposed patch not work for you? (the one which shifts the bootstream payload to block 4 in partition 1) Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
