On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: > I prefer to have this as is and share documentation with mx28. The > NAND ought to be done providing same interface so one doc for it all. > I think change it in next version is wrong and confuse users.
Ping? We won't be able to get rid of mxsboot for NAND use-case so I'd prefer to have it for SD as well. For me it does not matter much as I use OE and it automates it all; but for ordinary user it is important to it to be consistent so all 'mxs' SoC would work same way from user point of view. If we find a better way of doing things in future we can base on this and improve it later but please let's get it in and move forward... -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
