I'm confused. The patch you submitted internally was totally different.
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Haijun.Zhang <[email protected]>wrote: > From: "Haijun.Zhang" <[email protected]> > > The logic for the whether to configure for polling or DMA > was mistakenly reversed in this patch: > > Commit 7b43db92110ec2f15c5f7187a165f2928464966b > drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c: fix compiler warnings > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c > index e93e38a..8feb3d3 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static uint esdhc_xfertyp(struct mmc_cmd *cmd, struct > mmc_data *data) > > if (data) { > xfertyp |= XFERTYP_DPSEL; > -#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ESDHC_USE_PIO > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ESDHC_USE_PIO > xfertyp |= XFERTYP_DMAEN; > #endif > This logic is correct, as it is. PIO means NOT DMA. The original patch you sent corrected this part: #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ESDHC_USE_PIO in esdhc_setup_data. This patch seems to just break things further? Andy
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
