Oh, sorry I mistaken to git am the patch used internally. Actually there are changes. I'll send patch v2.
Regards Haijun. From: Andy Fleming [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 11:46 PM To: Zhang Haijun-B42677 Cc: U-Boot list; Fleming Andy-AFLEMING; sun york-R58495 Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Powerpc/esdhc: Correct judgement for DATA PIO mode I'm confused. The patch you submitted internally was totally different. On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Haijun.Zhang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: From: "Haijun.Zhang" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> The logic for the whether to configure for polling or DMA was mistakenly reversed in this patch: Commit 7b43db92110ec2f15c5f7187a165f2928464966b drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c: fix compiler warnings diff --git a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c index e93e38a..8feb3d3 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static uint esdhc_xfertyp(struct mmc_cmd *cmd, struct mmc_data *data) if (data) { xfertyp |= XFERTYP_DPSEL; -#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ESDHC_USE_PIO +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ESDHC_USE_PIO xfertyp |= XFERTYP_DMAEN; #endif This logic is correct, as it is. PIO means NOT DMA. The original patch you sent corrected this part: #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ESDHC_USE_PIO in esdhc_setup_data. This patch seems to just break things further? Andy
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
