On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Xie Xiaobo <[email protected]> wrote: > SPANSION recommend S25FL128S supersedes S25FL129P, and the two flash > memory have the same device ID and Memory architecture. So they can > use the same config parameters. > > Signed-off-by: Xie Xiaobo <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c > index 32b76e0..cfbd384 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static const struct spansion_spi_flash_params > spansion_spi_flash_table[] = { > .idcode2 = 0x4d01, > .pages_per_sector = 256, > .nr_sectors = 256, > - .name = "S25FL129P_64K", > + .name = "S25FL129P_64K/S25FL128S_64K", > }, > { > .idcode1 = 0x2019,
Thanks for this patch, but Sent the same change with your name as author. no issues. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/247607/ -- Thanks, Jagan. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
