On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:08:59 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:54:09 -0400, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The new in the patch > > board/ti/am335x/u-boot.lds needed to be re-synced with > > arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds again. > > Actually, I wonder why so many ARM .lds files need to exist at all, > when arch/arm/cpu/u-boot[-spl].lds could be used most of the time. I > suspect that the main reason for custom .lds files is ad hoc MEMORY > declarations, which could easily be commonalized through adequate > preprocessing. ... well here the only difference with arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds is the addition of board/ti/am335x/libam335x.o right after start.o but this should probably also be manageable in arch/arm/cpu/u-boot.lds. Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
