On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 07:51:13AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote: > Dear Wolfgang and Tom, > > Am 03.07.2013 11:54, schrieb Wolfgang Denk: > >Dear Xiangfu Liu, > > > >In message <4e95a3ba.8000...@pobox.com> you wrote: > >> > >>Add support for the qi_lb60 (a.k.a QI Ben NanoNote) clamshell device > >>from Qi hardware: > >> > >>http://en.qi-hardware.com/wiki/Ben_NanoNote > >>http://en.qi-hardware.com/wiki/Main_Page > >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qi_hardware > >> > >>This Jz4740-based clamshell device does not use NOR flash to boot. > >>The initial bring-up assumes that U-Boot is directly loaded into SDRAM > >>using USB boot tool, and starts from 0x80100000. > >... > >> MAINTAINERS | 4 + > >> MAKEALL | 4 +- > >> board/qi/qi_lb60/Makefile | 45 +++++++++ > >> board/qi/qi_lb60/config.mk | 31 +++++++ > >> board/qi/qi_lb60/qi_lb60.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++++++ > >> board/qi/qi_lb60/u-boot.lds | 61 +++++++++++++ > >> boards.cfg | 1 + > >> include/configs/qi_lb60.h | 211 > >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 8 files changed, 460 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 board/qi/qi_lb60/Makefile > >> create mode 100644 board/qi/qi_lb60/config.mk > >> create mode 100644 board/qi/qi_lb60/qi_lb60.c > >> create mode 100644 board/qi/qi_lb60/u-boot.lds > >> create mode 100644 include/configs/qi_lb60.h > > > >It has been pointed out (see [1]) that the files > > > > board/qi/qi_lb60/qi_lb60.c > > include/configs/qi_lb60.h > > > >added by this patch are licensed as GPL "version 3 of the License, or > >(at your option) any later version" - however, this is incompatible > >with the GPLv2 and GPLv2+ licenses that cover the rest of U-Boot. > > > >Would you be willing to re-license these files under GPLv2+ (and > >submit apatch to do that) ? Otherwise we would probably be forced to > >remove the qi_lb60 board support to be legally clean. > > > >Sorry for the inconvenience, but obviously this issue slipped through > >at the initial review of the code... > > > >[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/164965 > > No answer since > one week. > > Should we revert this for v2013.07, then?
Yes. I've done the revert and posted the patch, and I shall push it later today (barring an update from the authors) along with a few other things in prepartion for release. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
