Hi Albert, On 5 September 2013 18:58, Albert ARIBAUD <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Chander, > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:36:34 +0530, Chander Kashyap > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Albert, >> >> On 5 September 2013 17:08, Albert ARIBAUD <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hi Chander, >> > >> > On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 16:47:27 +0530, Chander Kashyap >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Lukasz, >> >> >> >> On 5 September 2013 16:27, Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi Chander, >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Its working for me. >> >> >> > But my dtc -v: "Version: DTC 1.3.0" >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Have you managed to properly build test Samsung's u-boot tree with DTC >> >> > 1.3.0? >> >> >> >> Yes, I am able to build and test. >> >> I am running on ubuntu. >> > >> > Then you are not testing on a recent enough U-Boot source tree; >> > currently, master (and arm) require dtc version >= 1.4.0, and will fail >> > as indicated by Lukasz and as experienced by me -- I had to build dtc >> > version 1.4.0 from git source. >> >> Sorry for big mess. I had re-based my tree to u-boot samsung. I have >> tested it after re-basing to u-boot tree. >> It was failing. >> >> Shall i send all the patches again, or is it possible to send the >> single failing patch. > > Well, if you have rebased to u-boot-master, then you can as well do an > interactive rebase so that the commit which breaks builds is omitted. >
Offending patch was part of two patch series. I have fixed it and resend it with series again. > Amicalement, > -- > Albert. -- with warm regards, Chander Kashyap _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
