Hi Eric, Thanks for your analyses
On 13/09/2013 19:01, Eric Nelson wrote: > I recommend that we simply adopt the main-line kernel naming, > and work up a couple of initial patches: I fully agree - this makes also code more maintainable if we will be in sync with kernel. > > 1. simply replace all of the names with their main-line > equivalent, and > 2. remove all of the unused (NO_PAD_I,NO_MUX_I) pad > declarations > Agree. > Each of these should be easy to inspect for correctness > and then we can focus on how to handle the differences > and produce binaries that support both variants. I think you proposed the right way to go on ;-) Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: [email protected] ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
