On 10/28/13 08:19, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Igor, > > Am 27.10.2013 08:30, schrieb Igor Grinberg: >> Hi Heiko, >> >> On 10/22/13 11:03, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>> - add omap24xx driver to new multibus/multiadpater support >>> - adapted all config files, which uses this driver >>> >>> Tested on the am335x based siemens boards rut, dxr2 and pxm2 >>> posted here: >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/263211/ >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher<h...@denx.de> >>> Tested-by: Tom Rini<tr...@ti.com> >>> Cc: Lars Poeschel<poesc...@lemonage.de> >>> Cc: Steve Sakoman<sako...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Thomas Weber<we...@corscience.de> >>> Cc: Tom Rix<tom....@windriver.com> >>> Cc: Grazvydas Ignotas<nota...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra<eballe...@iseebcn.com> >>> Cc: Luca Ceresoli<luca.ceres...@comelit.it> >>> Cc: Igor Grinberg<grinb...@compulab.co.il> >>> Cc: Ilya Yanok<ya...@emcraft.com> >>> Cc: Stefano Babic<sba...@denx.de> >>> Cc: Nishanth Menon<n...@ti.com> >>> Cc: Pali Rohár<pali.ro...@gmail.com> >>> Cc: Peter Barada<peter.bar...@logicpd.com> >>> Cc: Nagendra T S<nagen...@mistralsolutions.com> >>> Cc: Michael Jones<michael.jo...@matrix-vision.de> >>> Cc: Raphael Assenat<r...@8d.com> >> >> [...] > [...] > >>> diff --git a/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h b/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h >>> index 02ffbb1..a07559d 100644 >>> --- a/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h >>> +++ b/board/compulab/cm_t35/eeprom.h >>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ >>> #ifndef _EEPROM_ >>> #define _EEPROM_ >>> >>> -#ifdef CONFIG_DRIVER_OMAP34XX_I2C >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_I2C_OMAP34XX >>> int cm_t3x_eeprom_read_mac_addr(uchar *buf); >>> u32 cm_t3x_eeprom_get_board_rev(void); >>> #else >> >> Please, rebase on top of: >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/275284/ >> which should be applied any time soon. >> >> Otherwise, >> Acked-by: Igor Grinberg<grinb...@compulab.co.il> > > Hmm.. I cannot see, that your patch is accepted ... but I looked in it, > and it looks good to me. So, I propose to add this patch to the i2c tree, > so I do the necessary changes in my patch when applying it to the > i2c tree (as they are trivial changes) ...
Well, I have no problem with that, but we need to take into account that there are several more patches (unrelated to i2c) on the mailing list waiting for approval/apply and depend on my series. > > @Tom: Is this OK for you? I think, it would be better to apply my series to u-boot-ti and you can pull from it to the i2c tree? -- Regards, Igor. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
