Tom Rini <[email protected]> writes: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 05:28:56PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Masahiro Yamada, >> >> In message <[email protected]> you >> wrote: >> > Currently U-boot defins bool type by including <stdbool.h> >> > rather than defining directly. >> > But it does not work for some cross compilers. >> >> Can you explain why this fails? >> >> AFAICT, <stdbool.h> is a compiler provided header file, which is >> mandatory by the C99 ISO standard. So if a compiler fails to work >> using it, it looks as if the compiler was broken. > > Indeed. And the very ancient but (as far as I know) still "latest" gcc > for the SPARC port, which is 3.4.4, has it. So if there's a problem > here with blackfin it feels strongly like a toolchain issue.
FWIW, my Blackfin cross-gcc has a correct stdbool.h. Even gcc 2.95 has it. -- Måns Rullgård [email protected] _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
