Hi Masahiro Yamada, Why would hacking /include/linux/stddef.h and /include/linux/types.h be preferable?
Regards, Graeme On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi. > > I posted v2 of this patch > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/292258/ > > > I think both of two solutions work. > > (1) include <stdbool.h> in common/cmd_test.c > but undef true and false. > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/292247/ > > (2) Do not include <stdbool.h> and > define true and false with enum. > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/292258/ > > > Personally, I prefer (2) to (1) because > - we don't need to tweak common/cmd_test.c any more > - we can reduce the conflict if we have a plan to update > Linux-originated header files. > > > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada > > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot >
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
