On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 04:17:55 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 03:29:43 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> >> Both of these chips have 256kB big sectors, thus the _256K suffix, >> >> compared to their _64K counterparts, which have 64kB sectors. Also, >> >> they have four times less sectors than their _64K counterparts. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> >> >> Cc: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki <[email protected]> >> >> --- >> >> >> >> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 4 ++-- >> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> Note: Would be nice if someone actually tested this fix as I go by the >> >> >> >> datasheet and by the old code that _was_ in U-Boot before the >> >> rework. >> > >> > btw. would be nice to get this one into current release to prevent it >> > being broken. But I would _really_ appreciate some real-hardware testing >> > here. >> >> Yes - I'll try it and let us know. > > Thanks!
Tested on S25FL256S_256K, works fine! -- Thanks, Jagan. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
