Hi Marek,
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:10:25 +0200
Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:34:11 +0200
> >
> > Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
> > > > +static void read_data_from_flash_mem(uint8_t *buf, int len)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int i;
> > > > + uint32_t *buf32;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* transfer the data from the flash */
> > > > + buf32 = (uint32_t *)buf;
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < len / 4; i++)
> > > > + *buf32++ = readl(denali_flash_mem + INDEX_DATA_REG);
> > >
> > > Won't this trigger unaligned access if $buf is not aligned to 4-byte
> > > boundary ?
> >
> > Thanks for catching this.
> >
> > Actually, it would seldom happen because the aligned load address is
> > generally given.
> >
> > But I will add a sanity check here in v2, just in case.
>
> Or just use put_unaligned() ?
Oh, year! put_unaligned() would be better.
Thanks!
> > > > +
> > > > + /* setup the pipeline command */
> > > > + index_addr(cmd, 0x2000 | page_count);
> > >
> > > Magic value 0x2000 should be fixed here.
> >
> > Actually, this part is the same as that of the normal Denali driver
> > by Chin Liang See
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/357717/
> >
> > Moreover, it is the same as in Linux Kernel.
> >
> > I understand what you mean, but I guess we can excuse here.
>
> OK, I see. Is there any chance to fix this in Linux maybe eventually?
>
OK.
I will send a patch to linux-mtd ML
to use "#define PIPELINE_ACCESS 2000"
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
