On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 15:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 07/24/2014 10:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > For some reason even the original sunxi tree was missing this. > > The original tree is not missing it, in the original tree the logic is > backwards, > all board get AXP209 unless NO_AXP or AXP152 are defined.
Ah, I missed that tricky bit of logic. > I decided to not carry this "magic" forward to the upstream code, Yes, that makes absolute sense (and I now vague recall you telling me this before). > which means > that any board which does not have NO_AXP or AXP152 upstream needs AXP209 > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Thanks. FYI I've started collecting things into next to be swept into master and PR-d once the existing PR goes through. Ian. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
