Hi, On 07/27/2014 10:31 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 15:23 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 07/24/2014 10:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> For some reason even the original sunxi tree was missing this. >> >> The original tree is not missing it, in the original tree the logic is >> backwards, >> all board get AXP209 unless NO_AXP or AXP152 are defined. > > Ah, I missed that tricky bit of logic. > >> I decided to not carry this "magic" forward to the upstream code, > > Yes, that makes absolute sense (and I now vague recall you telling me > this before). > >> which means >> that any board which does not have NO_AXP or AXP152 upstream needs AXP209 >> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <[email protected]> >> >> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> > > Thanks. > > FYI I've started collecting things into next to be swept into master and > PR-d once the existing PR goes through.
I've pushed this patch to u-boot-sunxi next now. Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
