On Monday, August 04, 2014 at 04:41:03 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> On 03/08/14 17:09, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Sunday, August 03, 2014 at 09:34:42 AM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> >> Add initial support for Compulab CM-FX6 CoM.
> >> Support includes MMC, SPI flash, and SPL with dynamic DRAM detection.
> >> 
> >> Cc: Igor Grinberg <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Stefano Babic <[email protected]>
> >> Cc: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryanov <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>   arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c       |   1 -
> >>   board/compulab/cm_fx6/Makefile     |  12 ++
> >>   board/compulab/cm_fx6/cm_fx6.c     | 108 ++++++++++
> >>   board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c     |  83 ++++++++
> >>   board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.h     |  36 ++++
> >>   board/compulab/cm_fx6/imximage.cfg |   8 +
> >>   board/compulab/cm_fx6/spl.c        | 400
> >> 
> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ boards.cfg                        
> >> |
> >> 
> >>    2 +
> >>   
> >>   include/configs/cm_fx6.h           | 227 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   9 files changed, 876 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>   create mode 100644 board/compulab/cm_fx6/Makefile
> >>   create mode 100644 board/compulab/cm_fx6/cm_fx6.c
> >>   create mode 100644 board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c
> >>   create mode 100644 board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.h
> >>   create mode 100644 board/compulab/cm_fx6/imximage.cfg
> >>   create mode 100644 board/compulab/cm_fx6/spl.c
> >>   create mode 100644 include/configs/cm_fx6.h
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c
> >> index d3891dc..219263a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/ddr.c
> >> @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@
> >> 
> >>    *
> >>    * SPDX-License-Identifier:     GPL-2.0+
> >>    */
> >> 
> >> -
> >> 
> >>   #include <common.h>
> >>   #include <linux/types.h>
> >>   #include <asm/arch/mx6-ddr.h>
> > 
> > Drop this piece ;-)
> 
> Yep...
> 
> > [...]
> > 
> >> +++ b/board/compulab/cm_fx6/cm_fx6.c
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> >> +static ulong bank1_size;
> >> +static ulong bank2_size;
> >> +
> >> +#define MMDC1_MDCTL 0x21B0000
> >> +static int probe_mmdc_config(void)
> >> +{
> >> +  u32 val = readl(0x21B0000);
> >> +  switch (val) {
> >> +  case 0x83180000: /* DDR_16BIT_256MB */
> >> +          gd->ram_size    = 0x10000000;
> >> +          bank1_size      = 0x10000000;
> >> +          bank2_size      = 0;
> >> +          break;
> >> +  case 0x83190000: /* DDR_32BIT_512MB */
> >> +          gd->ram_size    = 0x20000000;
> >> +          bank1_size      = 0x20000000;
> >> +          bank2_size      = 0;
> >> +          break;
> > 
> > imx_ddr_size() won't cut it here ?
> 
> It doesn't handle 4GB correctly (returns 0). I suppose
> I can make a patch which caps the return value of
> imx_ddr_size() for MX6 socs to 3840MB.
> What do you think?

That you should check the U-Boot ML, since that's what I did yesterday ;-) But 
still, this is rather sad practice -- instead of fixing a bug in code which you 
do know about, you implement such a workaround :-(
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to