On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote:
> I try to sumarize the result of the discussion. This file was > factorized, but it was proofed that calibration data are very board > specific, and factorizing this file is not correct. I agree with Fabio > and Eric that it is very unlike to have the same calibration data for > different boards and the reuse of the same data is not correct. > > However, with this statement the patch should also unbind the congatec > board from the sabresd, not only change the reference. A congatec > specific board must be also created in congatec/cgtqmx6eval, and it is > only a case that it has the same values of the sabresd. Yes, this is a good approach. Nitin, Please send a v3 based on Stefano's suggestion. Regards, Fabio Estevam _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
