Hi Tang, On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:12:06 +0800, Tang Yuantian <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are 8 SCFG_SPARECR registers in SCFG memory block, not > just one. > > Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h > index 7995fe2..b5db720 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-ls102xa/immap_ls102xa.h > @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ struct ccsr_scfg { > u32 etsecmcr; > u32 sdhciovserlcr; > u32 resv14[61]; > - u32 sparecr; > + u32 sparecr[8]; > }; > > /* Clocking */ Obviously the original code was not problematic as sparecr was not used. Is your change dictated by a patch or series that you are preparing and that will use sparecr? Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
