On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:59:44PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > In message <20141022160936.GY25506@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > I think for Wolfgang's case that might just have to be handled with an > > external wrapper, translating all of the ways to run MAKEALL into > > Yes, you are right, an external wrapper would work, too. Silly me. > > OTOH, why not keep a script under the old name that provides such > functionality to translate calls to the buildman API?
My concern is that we'll get people complaining about things not being mapped back exactly right. For example, MAKEALL am335x_evm builds one board, am335x_evm_config but buildman am335x_evm builds the whole family of configs. For a build test bisect run, that's fine (even if not optimal in that it'll build more than required). In fact if I read things right (Simon?) buildman is bad for a single board/config. If we map out MAKEALL's -m/-M to just fail and say use get_maintainer.pl I think we can "good enough" map out everything else. With perhaps an echo to please use buildman directly when possible? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
