Hi Wolfgang, On 22 October 2014 11:56, Wolfgang Denk <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Simon, > > In message <CAPnjgZ2ZmGiQoi-mKQxK0vNPCs3hhqgk= > [email protected]> you wrote: > > > > >> My concern is that we'll get people complaining about things not being > > >> mapped back exactly right. For example, MAKEALL am335x_evm builds one > > >> board, am335x_evm_config but buildman am335x_evm builds the whole > family > > >> of configs. For a build test bisect run, that's fine (even if not > > >> optimal in that it'll build more than required). In fact if I read > > >> things right (Simon?) buildman is bad for a single board/config. > > > > > > This is one of my open questions with buildman, too. Simon? > > > > Yes it does a substring match. I'm open to suggestions on this though. > > It actually supports regular expressions. > > So something like > > buildman '^am335x_evm$' > > would work? > Yes: $ ./tools/buildman/buildman -s am335x_evm -n boards.cfg is up to date. Nothing to do. Dry run, so not doing much. But I would do this: Building current source for 5 boards (4 threads, 1 job per thread) Build directory: ../current am335x_evm : 5 boards Total boards to build for each commit: 5 $ ./tools/buildman/buildman -s am335x_evm$ -n boards.cfg is up to date. Nothing to do. Dry run, so not doing much. But I would do this: Building current source for 1 boards (1 thread, 4 jobs per thread) Build directory: ../current am335x_evm$ : 1 boards Total boards to build for each commit: 1 Regards, Simon
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
